We consider the
problem of “fair” scheduling the resources to one of the many mobile stations
by a centrally controlled base station (BS). The BS is the only entity taking
decisions in this framework based on truthful information from the mobiles on
their radio channel. We study the well-known family of parametric $alpha$ -fair
scheduling problems from a game-theoretic perspective in which some of the
mobiles may be non cooperative. We first show that if the BS is unaware of the
non cooperative behavior from the mobiles, the non cooperative mobiles become
successful in snatching the resources from the other cooperative mobiles,
resulting in unfair allocations. If the BS is aware of the non cooperative
mobiles, a new game arises with BS as an additional player. It can then do
better by neglecting the signals from the non cooperative mobiles. The BS,
however, becomes successful in eliciting the truthful signals from the mobiles
only when it uses additional information (signal statistics). This new policy
along with the truthful signals from mobiles forms Nash equilibrium (NE) that
we call a Truth Revealing Equilibrium. Finally, we propose new iterative
algorithms to implement fair scheduling policies that robustify the otherwise
non robust (in presence of noncooperation) $alpha$-fair scheduling algorithms.
No comments:
Post a Comment